He doesn't speak to any of these people

James O’Brien gave a talk at the RSA that caught my attention. His far-ranging talk eventually caught on Paul Dacre, executive editor of the Daily Mail. His comments ring true also of Trump and any of his oligarchic band that would seek to undermine democracy:

Remember he’s never spoken to any of these people; he never will. … He never has to buy new shoes; you know why? Because he never walks on anything other than carpet. He gets out of his chauffeur-driven car where he crosses about six foot of Kensington pavement and then he’s back in the executive suite of the Daily Mail. He gets back in his chauffeur-driven car. He gets taken to his club. He gets taken to his shooting estate in Scotland. He gets taken to his gated community.

He doesn’t speak to any of these people, but he tells them every day to be terrified, to be full of hate, to be angry, to be bitter, to blame their neighbour for everything that’s gone wrong in their life. He tells them every single day not to trust anyone, not to believe in the healing power of love and redemption and peace. He tells them “crush the saboteurs, enemies of the people. Academics can’t be trusted. Parliamentary sovereignty can’t be trusted. The rule of law, the High Court judges can’t be trusted.” Think about this list of institutions that a man whose entire career has been built on defending British values [has maligned]. He hasn’t got a British value left. He has maligned sovereign Parliament. He’s maligned functioning democracy as represented by MP’s who disagree with him - they’re the saboteurs. The enemy of the people are the High Court judges. That’s the rule of law that’s under attack. Freedom of the press? Not really.

James O'Brien How to be right in a world gone wrong
L-R method for language learning

L-R method for language learning

I’ve recently discovered the L-R system of language learning and have been setting up to learn it.

The idea is that you begin with long texts - novels, for example - in your target language (L2) and follow a systematic approach to reading and listening.

L-R system in a nutshell

Here are the steps:

  1. Read the text in L1 (your native language) and become familiar with it.^[I rephrased this intruction from other sources that say “read the translation” because what if the text itself if a translation? For example, my first text to try this with is Гарри Поттер и философский камень which was originally written in English and then translated into Russian, among other languages. So, it’s best to say for the first step “Read the text in your L1 and become very very familiar with what it says.”]
  2. Listen to the recording and simultaneously read the text in L2.
  3. Listen to the recording while reading the text in L1.
  4. Repeat after the speaker. But only do this once you truly understand the meaning of what you’re repeating. The goal is meaning, not only pronunciation.
  5. Translate the text from L1 to L2 by covereing up one side while reading the other.

Tips

It is hard, very hard in fact, to find parallel texts. Even if you can find .txt documents online, the formatting is a challenge. Columns in Word or Pages simply don’t work, because the L2 and L1 doesn’t line up properly. So here’s what I did for formatting Harry Potter and the Philosopher’s Stone^[Before you accuse me of intellectual property theft, I will mention that I own both the Russian translation and the English language original in book form. So no harm done to anyone.]:

The misinterpreted-effort hypothesis

This is an interesting study nicely summarized in The Bulletproof Musician.

Learners exposed to two different study methods - blocked vs interleaved practice - preferred the blocked practice method, a learning method known to be less effective. Rather than attribute it to laziness, the authors of the study hypothesized that learner’s simply don’t know what method of practice (study) is more effective so that interpret the more difficult method (interleaved) as being harder.

Saturday, November 9, 2019

Saturday, November 9, 2019

Word has it that Trump might want to attend the Victory Day military parade in Moscow. Это наша победа - “This is our victory!” has never seemed more fitting.

Trump has no idea about the cultural significance of День победы in Russia. It is a cultural holiday of greatest significance to former Soviet Union. It is a patriotic holiday; but the President of the United States should shy away from celebrating the patriotism of another country. It is their private celebration.